corigin.com

sofware news

Ohio’s Alternative to Diebold Machines May Be Equally Bad

Posted in Live (December 30, 2007 at 11:17 pm)

phorest writes “One would have thought the choice of Ohio lawmakers to move away from Diebold touch-screen voting terminals would be welcomed by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU). Instead, the group is warning the elections board that their alternative might be illegal under state laws. ‘The main dispute is whether a central optical scan of ballots at the board’s headquarters downtown would result in votes not being counted on ballots that are incorrectly filled out. The ACLU believes the intent of election law is to ensure voters can be notified immediately of a voting error and be able to make a second-chance vote.’”

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

…more

Group Sues To Stop German E-VotingColorado The Latest To Ditch E-Voting MachinesFlorida Election Ballots to be Printed On-DemandOhio Study Confirms Voting Systems VulnerabilitiesDiebold Voter Fraud Rumors in New Hampshire Primaries

No Responses to “Ohio’s Alternative to Diebold Machines May Be Equally Bad”

  1. Carleigh Says:

    We provide Sureslim films that.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.